About the blog

“EvoAnth” is a shortening of the subject name “Evolutionary Anthropology” which is the study of humans and their evolution. It’s a broad subject that studies our technology, behaviour, beliefs and any other aspect of humanity which has been influenced by our evolutionary heritage. Which is pretty much everything.

This blog is an attempt to spread the knowledge evolutionary anthropology has gained to as many people as possible. After all, everyone evolved.


Mistaken Mondays – Posts about people being wrong about human evolution

Tuesdays and Thursdays – Articles on news stories or key evoanth topics. Basically me being serious.

Wondering Wednesdays – I answer reader questions. Submit yours here

Friday Factoid  – Short posts on fun little news stories or facts from evoanth. By fun I mean “posts sprinkled with lame jokes”

Simian Sundays  – A post about something ape/monkey related. After all, we did in fact evolve from filthy monkey-men


About me

I am a PhD student at the University of Liverpool studying human evolution. In addition to my studies, I volunteer at a local museum and for open days for younger school students visiting the university.

What motivated me to start this blog wasn’t something that, on the surface, was connected with human evolution. I was giving a presentation to a group of school students about my university. They were apparently interested in biological sciences and so, appropriately, the presentation was given by university students studying biology. And little ol’ me from the archaeology department, and yet I was asked the most questions. These students were asking me about the origin of art and the development of technology. People are clearly interested in where they came from, yet there are too few sources providing this information.

Accordingly, I resolved to start this blog and to do my best to share information on the evolution of human culture, including art and technologies. And hopefully this blog will serve as a bit of an outlet for me so my long-suffering friends won’t have to listen to yet another “fun fact” about how we evolved.

Related posts

44 thoughts on “About”

  1. We get the picture that human ancestors were, some at least, relatively small and weak, with unimpressive teeth. Obviously these human ancestors had a toolkit of artifacts and behaviors which allowed them to become ancestors. Here is my question. I think no modern apes can throw as hard and accurately as some humans can. Select people make big bucks by throwing hard and accurately, therefore it is likely the anatomical and physiological aspects of hard and accurate throwing are well know. Has any one studied whether any of our ancestors could throw hard and accurately? I can picture a carnivore looking at a group of Australopithecines and thinking, “If I go after them, I will have several 100 MPH, quarter pound rocks bounced off my head.”

    1. I know about some research into whether certain tools would be good for throwing and bits about whether neanderthals could throw well, but nothing specifically on this issue of australopiths throwing random rocks. I’ll look into it, maybe make a post on it at some point in the future

  2. I just wanted to say thank you for posting on EveryMagicalDay. I followed your comments back here and am ecstatic to find a blog I will look forward to reading as much as this!

  3. This is a great blog! I’ve really missed reading about new discoveries from before anatomically modern humans so this is a great and straight-forward digest.

    1. Fine motor control is very important to language, but to what extent does it overlap between different parts of the body. If I “evolved” the ability to move my legs with more finesse, would it also improve my ability to control my thumb? Or is controlling different parts distinct in the brain? Or if they are linked, is it because one improves the other or are they symptoms of something else improving both?

      All of these questions and more would have to be answered before this research is considered something other than “promising, but only preliminary”

      I may discuss it on the blog at a later date

  4. I wonder about handedness. i am right handed, and my right hand can do things for which my left hand has no clue. On the other hand ;-), both hands attended typing class at the same time, and type equally well; maybe the left is a hair better.

    1. Handedness was discussed at HOBET and I was surprised to learn that the dominance of right handedness in the population appears to have been a relatively recent development; within the last 1 my or so.

      If I can find the original source for the presentation (hopefully it includes some more info on the development of handedness) it I’ll try and write about it this Wednesday as a “wondering Wednesday” post. Or is there something more specific you were interested in?

  5. If you read to the end, you will see that they used noninvasive techniques to study differences between climbers and nonclimbers. You might rethink your comment.

  6. Over on Greg Laden’s blog he discusses work on throwing and human evolution published by Barbara Issac in 1987. Very interesting!

  7. 20th century me, this was the best I could easily find. The little note on are cricketers primitive in the science sections gives a partial reference to the journal and volume. I leave the matter in the hands of a 21st century adapted person.

    1. 2 million years ago is before any records of spears, spear points or really anything that could be remotely considered a projectile. Which begs the question, just what were they throwing?

      1. I think the new theme is great by the way. Clean and calm, plenty of content on show but somehow still not too busy. Good choice!
        – James

        1. Font was a real bugbear of mine to start with, especially the size. The theme I’m using now is my second, after near-constant experimentation.
          And thanks very much!

      1. The furry Mexican family has a mutated gene on their X chromosomes. Apparently recessive. Having problems with your blog.

  8. Dear Adam,

    I am an astronomer, but I’ve always had a soft spot for paleoanthropology as well. I’ve read a few of your posts and I find them very interesting and informative. Thank you for making the effort of popularizing these things, and keep up the good work! I’ll definitively come back to read more of your stuff.



  9. When I read your “About” section it became immediately clear that you need to edit your writing to correct for basic, technical errors. If you are a second language learner then I understand your temporary limitations, and I am willing to help with an edit.


    1. Unfortunately its nothing so excusable. I’m just really bad at English. I’m working on this around a phd so don’t have as much time for proof reading as I’d like.

  10. Hi Adam,
    I’m working on a paper for school and was reading one of your pieces on Cave Art. I was curious, are you still at the University of Liverpool or have you gotten your PhD and moved on to something new and exciting. Also are you still even active on this website?

    1. I’d like to think I’m still active, what with the latest post only being 5 days old.

      I’m still at Liverpool, now in the final year of my PhD.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.